Infection Control Today

JUN 2019

ICT delivers to infection preventionists & their colleagues in the operating room, sterile processing/central sterile, environmental services & materials management, timely & relevant news, trends & information impacting the profession & the industry

Issue link: http://digital.infectioncontroltoday.com/i/1116067

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 17 of 35

14 ICT June 2019 www.infectioncontroltoday.com feature By Sylvia Garcia, RN, MBA, CIC If you've been a healthcare worker for a long time you may remember the first documented case of HIV transmission to a healthcare worker. It happened to Barbara Fassbinder, RN, in 1986 after the cuts from a weekend of gardening left her hands vulnerable to infection. 1 While caring for an emergency room patient she was asked by a doctor to remove an intravenous catheter and applied pressure with a piece of gauze to the puncture wound for about 10 minutes. She did not wear gloves because it was not the standard in 1986. Because of hers and other healthcare workers' willingness to come forward, the healthcare arena learned that human immunodeficiency virus, a disease with certain mortality in 1986, was able to be transmitted through contact of infected blood with non-intact skin. In December 1991, the Occupa- tional Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) promulgated the Bloodborne Pathogens standard. This standard is designed to protect workers from the risk of exposure to bloodborne pathogens, including but not limited to HIV. It requires protection of healthcare workers from exposure to bloodborne pathogens through implementation of control measures – including proper selection, training, and use of personal protective equipment (PPE) that many healthcare workers take for granted today. In 2014 when two nurses were infected with Ebola, healthcare facilities rushed to ensure that they had personnel trained in use of specialty PPE to care for these highly infectious patients. There was renewed attention to availability and selection of appropriate PPE as well as training and competency of staff who might take care of these patients. Funds were appro- priated and released by the federal government to ensure medical facilities were prepared and available to take care of these patients. Now, in 2019, these funds are in their last year and many are wondering how we will protect our healthcare workers from the latest outbreak of Ebola. What facilities must realize is that these funds were never meant to ensure that basic infection control procedures that every healthcare worker should know Creating a Safer Environment for Healthcare Providers: Focus on Personal Protective Equipment and will be following are in place. The requirement that includes providing and ensuring compliance with PPE is part of the "cost of doing business" and was expanded in 1994 when OSHA's Personal Protective Equipment for General Industry, 29CFR 1910.132, went into effect. OSHA's General Industry standard applies when the PPE deemed necessary to protect workers from infectious disease does not fall under coverage of the bloodborne pathogens standard. 2 For example, it would include PPE needed to protect healthcare workers from antibiotic resistant organisms. Type of PPE chosen could impact the exposure risk s to employees. The FDA has a role in in regulating personal protective equipment including surgical masks, medical gloves, and gowns. Their requirements vary depending on the specific type of PPE. Ensuring that chosen PPE follow FDA regulations can provide reasonable assurance that the device is safe and effective. 3 The order of gown removal also impacts the risk of organism transmission. A recent article by Okamoto, et al. assessed the impact of errors related to removal of PPE on healthcare worker contamination with multidrug-resistant organisms. 4 They found that healthcare workers made multiple doffi ng errors and those that made the errors were more likely to have contaminated their clothing following interaction with a patient in isolation for a multidrug-resistant organism. Healthcare workers were also found to be at greater risk of hand contamination if they removed gloves fi rst. Proper selection and use of PPE are essential to the safety of our number one resource in healthcare – our employees! It is not enough to buy gowns, gloves and masks. Employees must be able to choose that appropriate PPE for the anticipated exposure as well as don, doff and appropriately discard or decontaminate it if reusable. Facilities must ensure that they are following all law and regulations related to infection prevention and control (LD.04.01.01) to achieve and maintain Joint Commission Accreditation. How many times have we seen a healthcare worker: • put on gloves that are too small and likely to leak or tear? Ò Type of PPE chosen could impact the exposure risks to employees. T e FDA has a role in in regulating personal protective equipment including surgical masks, medical gloves, and gowns.

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Infection Control Today - JUN 2019